Learning Japanese Language is nowhere less than a rewarding journey which opens doors to cultural experiences and career opportunities. In order to check your proficiency level, you must either opt for Nihongo Aptitude Test - NAT or Japanese Language Proficiency Tests - JLPT. Both tests serve as benchmarks for your language skills, but they have distinct differences.
Here in this ultimate guide, we will understand about Nihongo Aptitude Tests - NAT and Japanese Language Proficiency Tests - JLPT in detail and compare to see which is the right choice.
NAT is one of the well-known proficiency tests for Japanese Language learners. The test is basically designed by Japan Educational Exchanges and Services (JEES) in cooperation with the Association of International Education, Japan (AIEJ). It basically measures the practical Japanese skills of non-native speakers.
NAT – test structure is also similar to JLPT structure and offers five levels. However, in NAT 5Q id for the beginners and 1Q is the advanced level. The test covers three main sections:
Each section of the NAT is scored separately, and a each level score determines your overall performance. Unlike the JLPT, NAT results are typically available within a few weeks after the test.
Pros:
Cons:
JLPT – Japanese Language Proficiency Test is the widely recognised test for measuring the Japanese Language Proficiency. This test is administered by the Japan Foundation and Japan Educational Exchanges and Services (JEES).
The JLPT is divided into five levels, from N5 (beginner) to N1 (advanced). The JLPT N3 level is further divided into 3 major sections as follows:
The test is scored on a scale, with each section (Language Knowledge, Reading, and Listening) having its own score. To pass, you need to achieve the overall pass mark as well as the minimum score required in each section. Results are typically released two to three months after the test date.
Pros:
Cons:
If your goal is to study or work in Japan, the JLPT is generally more beneficial due to its widespread recognition. Japanese universities and companies often require JLPT certification, especially at the N2 or N1 levels.
If you need a more flexible testing schedule, NAT is the better option. With six test dates a year, you can plan your test around your schedule and retake it sooner if needed.
Both tests have similar structures, but if you prefer a test that emphasizes practical language use, NAT might be more suitable. On the other hand, if you appreciate a structured progression with clear levels, JLPT’s format will be advantageous.
Consider the availability of test centres near you. JLPT is offered in more countries and cities worldwide, which might make it more accessible depending on your location.